Skip to main content

Case #42 - re The People vs Wilbert Seelhorst (A matter of perspective)

Case #42 - re The People vs Wilbert Seelhorst (A matter of perspective)

     I was working with Wilbert Seelhorst one Day shift in 1989 or 1990.  It was the end of shift and we were heading into the station.  We decided to stop a car at Main and 192nd streets.  Wilbert was the bookman and I was the driver.  As our cars stopped, Wilbert bailed out and got up on the  passenger side using that patented strut of his.  He was leaning at an odd angle to his right, with his left shoulder raised, but tilted forward, left hand hanging in the air in front of his left hip. Right shoulder dropped, but tilted forward, because of the way he rested the back of his hand on his gun butt, with the top of the web of his hand on it, so his palm faced the sky.  On top of all that, every so often, his left shoulder would jerk upward as his head would jerk briefly down towards it. But this case isn’t about his oddball physical mannerisms.  Far be it from me, to pick on the peculiarities and foibles of another person.

When I reached the driver’s window, I saw there were two guys in the front and three guys in the back.  They all looked like wetbacks coming from work.  I asked the driver,
"Do you have a license?"
He looked up at me with a hopeful smile and softly said,
"E-yes."
"Let me have it.", I said
"E-yes.", he softly repeated.
I quickly evaluated him and his passengers.
"Any of you guys speak English?", I asked, as I looked at all of them.
They looked at each other for a couple of seconds, before the driver responded for all of them with,
"E-yes."
"Give me your driver's license.", I asked, not very hopefully.
"E-yes."
"fuck", I thought to myself. I heard Seelhorst snickering.

     I told the driver to shut the car off and mimed the action for him.  The driver nodded and reached for the keys in the ignition, but instead of turning the keys, the driver pulled the keys out, ignition plug and all, leaving the car running.  Then he placed the keys and attached ignition plug on the seat and picked up a flathead screwdriver.  He inserted the screwdriver into the hole left by the ignition plug and turned the car off.  Then the driver placed the screwdriver on the seat, replaced the key and attached ignition plug in the steering column, placed both hands on the wheel.  He smiled innocently up at me.  Having seen a stolen car or two before, I knew a punched ignition when I saw one.  I drew my .357 revolver, aimed it at the driver’s innocent smile and advised my partner,
“It’s punched!”

     I couldn’t believe what I saw next.  Instead of drawing his weapon, like a NORMAL deputy, Wilbert leaned down and took a look at the ignition himself.  Seeing the keys dangling there, he straightened up and casually said,
“No, it’s not.”
And now I couldn’t believe what I had just heard.  My five senses were failing me rapidly.
“Hey!  The car’s punched!”
Wilbert gave a resigned sigh, leaned over and looked at the ignition again.
“Nnno it’s not.” not so casually.
“Yes it is!”
“No it’s not!”
“Yessss, it is!”
“Noooo, it’s not!”
‘Yes, it IS!”
No, it’s NOT!”
“IS!”
“NOT!”
“IS!”
“NOT!”
“Wilbert!” I said through gritted teeth, “The fuckin’ car is PUNCHED, Goddamnit!”
“Ohhh, allllright.” Wilbert said, Like he was annoyed, as he rolled his eyes and reluctantly drew his revolver, and tiredly rested his forearm on his holster.  His wrist was relaxed as it draped over the front of his breakfront holster, placing his aim somewhere between the car window and the curb near the front tire.  I pulled everyone out of the car, patted them down and sat them in our backseat, or on the curb.  Then I reached in and angrily yanked out the key with attached ignition plug and held it in front of Wilbert’s face,
“Well?” I demanded
“Okay, it’s punched.”

After all of that, it turned out the car wasn't stolen.  Jose had bought it in that condition from an auction. Wilbert snickered.  "Fuckfuckingfuckerfuckityfuck!", I thought.

Verdict – Wilbert Seelhorst, the Court finds you Guilty of Not Trusting Your Partner.  You're also found Guilty of Holding Your Weapon Like It's Your Pecker And You Just Don't Give A Shit If You Miss The Toilet, Because Your Wife Will Clean Up The Mess Anyways

 Sentence – This Court orders you to attend a Desert Trip and a River Trip.  On each of those trips, you will be blindfolded and stripped naked from the time camp is set up, until the time camp is broken.  Your fellow campers will take turns being your eyes.  "Pugsley" can be your eyes at potty time.  He can tell you if the shithole is deep enough and direct your aim (see case #13, for why).  Jeff Fleming will be your eyes at meal time.  The Court suggests you not read about the Fleming Juicer (case #37) until you return.  Oh, you're also ordered to attend Basic Weapons Training again, so you can learn how to hold your damn weapon!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Case #11- The LASD vs L.A.P.D. (playing cops and cops)

     In September 1987, the Carson patrol area known as, "Tortilla Flats", was suffering a rash of burglaries.  To combat this, Deputy Ray Gayton-Jacob and Al Harris, who were training officers at the time, came up with a burglary suppression plan.  On, about, Wednesday, September 14, 1987, Ray and his trainee would be dressed in full uniform, but in an unmarked, Chevy Malibu, detective car.  They would cruise the Tortilla Flats neighborhood looking for burglars.  Al and his trainee, would remain outside of the neighborhood in a regular patrol car.  If Ray and his partner saw something suspicious, they would keep an eye on it and call in Al and his trainee to check it out.      Things were quiet, until about 1:00 A.M..  Ray, and his trainee, had just finished jamming a hype at Torrance Boulevard and New Hampshire Avenue and had resumed their patrol.  Ray spotted a black and white patrol car coming slowly their way.  Ray assumed it was Al.  Ray assumed wrong.  It was an L.A.

Case #65 - re The People vs Don Chanler (A lesson for all trainees)

  Case #65 - re The People vs Don Chanler ( A lesson for all trainees ) Don Chanler was the Question Cadet in our Academy class, class #226.  At the end of each long day, one of the staff instructors would come in and, prior to dismissing us for the day, would always ask if anyone had any questions about the day's classes.  There was only one cadet who would ever raise his hand.  Don Frickin' Chanler.  Chanler would immediately raise his hand and the staff instructor would resignedly call his name. Chanler would always ask obvious question, after obvious question, delaying our release for the day with ev-ery sin-gle point-less ques-tion.  As with all Question Cadets, only he was interested in what he had to ask.  Three years later, Don Frickin Chanler came to Carson with me, Mike Chacon and about 8 other people from our Academy class.  In Patrol School, we were not relieved to discover that he had not changed.  In fact he had gotten worse, because not only was he the Question C

On Nicknames

  On Nicknames My wife once asked me why a large number of my male friends and acquaintances are referred to by nicknames. “Oso”, “Rick the Hawaiian”, “Vic the SEAL”, Chinaman Dave”, “Little Dave”, “Big Dave”, “Mexican Dave”, “Dave the plumber”, “Cliffdiver”, “Bucky”, “the Count”, the “Rock”, “Code 4 Greg”, “White Shaft”, “Bosko”, “Chodown”, “Sexual Chocolate”, “Kianporiguez”, “Krakatoa”, “Brian the Bee Guy”, “Chip” (aka, “Okie”), “Cowboy”, “Spot”, “Seven”, “Red Dot”, “Spiderman” aka “Turtleman”, “Freddie Krueger” and  “Smilin' Bob”, were a few. In pretty much any group, made up mostly of men, you will find that nicknames are common. There are probably more guys nicknamed, “Tex”, in the military than in Texas. Most nicknames are a result of one of the following. - An adapted version of your actual name. “G8”, was so named, because nobody could pronounce his name and there were 8 letters in it, beginning with “G”. “Bosckovich, which has even more letters, but was at least pro